Reimagining Crime Deterrence and Community Investment: A Case Study of Chicago Public Safety Policy 

Chicago is a city that stands among America’s greatest metropolises, yet its legacy has long been tainted by a reputation of heightened violence and criminal activity. The city’s struggle to improve public safety has taken a prime seat in the political consciousness of policymakers and residents alike, sparking questions about the nature of violence, the circumstances that inspire it, and the ways it can be prevented. At this moment, Chicago is facing a potential turning point amidst recent record reductions in violent crime. When public safety strategy has proven a contentious partisan issue, these changes present a valuable opportunity to evaluate different mechanisms of enforcing the law and protecting city residents. 

Contemporary debate across the country broadly centers on two distinct, oftentimes competing, approaches to crime: reform-based interventions that prioritize community investment rather than direct force, and traditional policing strategies that emphasize police presence and enforcement. However, placing these narratives in direct opposition to one another can flatten the issue into moral binaries, obscuring effective solutions that require a more nuanced synthesis of ideas. We can ground this debate in Chicago’s recent public safety approach, which has proven promising thus far, yet remains incomplete in balancing these theories. 

The city’s recent leadership—including Mayor Brandon Johnson and his predecessor Lori Lightfoot—has centered its public safety philosophy on addressing the root causes of violence through policies that work to enhance community involvement and rebuild trust in the city’s safety networks. Despite criticisms that previously framed these plans as naive or ineffective, the data suggest they are producing meaningful results. Since his election, Johnson’s administration has expanded the One Summer Chicago youth employment program by 55 percent, welcoming 31,000 new hires to the city’s workforce last summer (City of Chicago, 2025). Over the program’s duration, the five city areas with the highest concentration of youth hires experienced double-digit declines in homicides, shootings, robberies, and carjackings (City of Chicago, 2025). These outcomes suggest that youth employment weakens the capacity for criminal activity by occupying idle time and providing productive outlets that redirect community focus toward long-term personal advancement. 

As part of these reform efforts, Chicago’s expansion of community violence intervention programs produced similar results. The city’s Peacekeeper program was an initiative introduced prior to Johnson’s term, establishing a network of civilian ‘Peacekeepers’ to respond to conflicts across appointed communities (Northwestern University, 2024). An evaluation of the program’s impact conducted between 2023 and 2024 highlighted notable reductions in shooting victimizations across Peacekeeper neighborhoods, reporting longer average time intervals between shooting incidents in violence hotspots (Northwestern University, 2024). These programs counter prior conceptions of crime reduction, suggesting that community-led interventions can effectively prevent crime by leveraging internal familiarity and appointing trusted individuals to intervene in conflicts before they escalate, without introducing additional force.

When assessed together, these initiatives challenge the notion that community-based approaches to public safety are inherently ineffective, demonstrating that violence is shaped by broader norms affirmed by community focus and behavior. If we extend community resources that provide pathways to fulfillment outside hierarchies of violence, the incentives that sustain criminal behavior weaken significantly as public safety shifts into a collective responsibility. However, these transformations in community identity are longitudinal and unfold gradually. In the meantime, crime remains a concern for Chicago residents despite statistical progress.

Public opinion data confirms that general perception of safety is misaligned with cited incidence decreases. Polling conducted during the 2023 mayoral race revealed that, despite majority support for police reform, 71 percent of Chicago voters also indicated that they desired more police on the streets (Arm, 2023). More recent data revealed that as of last October, 76 percent of residents still consider crime to be a high-priority political issue (NORC, 2025). These data suggest that there is a persistent mismatch between numerical crime trends and how this impact has been received amongst community members.

In addition to reducing the numerical incidence of crime, this perception of violence in itself is integrally important to the well-being of Chicago citizens, as perceived danger and instability not only damage one’s health through chronic stress, but can actually lead to more criminal activity. Studies have indicated that community violence exposure has a significant correlation with post-traumatic stress and aggression, the latter often manifesting through hostility, anger, delinquency, apathetic/antisocial behavior, and violence (McDonald and Richmond, 2010). Further research has revealed that adolescents who perceive high neighborhood violence, regardless of their direct exposure level, are more likely to affiliate with “deviant peers” and engage in risk-taking behavior (Cammack et al., 2013). On a neurological and socio-emotional processing level, those exposed to neighborhood violence exhibit increased amygdala activity and fear-response, often associated with heightened emotional-reactivity to threatening and even neutral environmental stimuli such as facial expression (Suarez et al. 2024, and France et al., 2022). Essentially, in areas where residents have been victimized by or borne witness to frequent violence, where inhabitants perceive danger as imminent, criminal deviance can solidify as a standard practice, whilst the need to assert oneself and behave reactively can develop as a defense mechanism to perceived threats. In this manner, violence is reinforced not only as a community norm but as a necessity created through perceived lack of security. For residents, it is not just the recorded data points that matter, but the perception of danger, which can breed social unease and actually perpetuate more illegal activity. In terms of disincentivizing and responding to unflawful conduct, policing can directly shape these perceptions in ways that community investment alone cannot entirely replace, by increasing perceived security through reliable protective presence.

The police presence that the city’s populace desires does not necessarily jeopardize progressive reform. On the contrary, it can enhance reform efforts if given the proper support. A 2023 review of Chicago’s Neighborhood Policing Initiative—a program incorporating long-term community collaboration into police practice—indicated that the program’s effectiveness was directly undermined by these shortages (Northwestern University, 2023). The report found that officers who had been specifically assigned through the NPI to problem-solve and strategize alongside community volunteers were unable to wholly commit to their roles, often being called to fill the duties of traditional beat officers due to a lack of personnel, requiring officers to spread their attention across multiple domains, essentially devaluing community policing as a superficial priority (Northwestern University, 2023). This example illustrates a key consequence of these shortages, where overextended departments are unable to devote intentional, uninterrupted focus to implementing changes that meaningfully restructure police work alongside communities—efforts intended to balance the need for protection with recent demands to revise our country’s justice system.

However, Chicago’s institutional capacity to provide protection against perceived threats remains under strain. The Chicago Police Department has battled chronic understaffing in recent years, its forces reduced by 1,200 employees since 2019 (Cherrone, 2025). This discrepancy has placed a notable burden on department staff, creating an additional workload requiring the CPD to pay employees an aggregate $238 million for over 2 million overtime hours last fiscal year, vastly exceeding the department’s $100M annual budget allotment for overtime compensation (Spielman, 2025). These budget shortfalls were so severe that Mayor Johnson has recently ordered the department to decrease its spending by 3-5% in the next year, prompting the CPD to slow hiring and recruitment cycles (Spielman, 2025). These strains on policing don’t just weaken enforcement capacity, but they can actually inhibit the implementation of reformative policing tactics that holistically accommodate the needs of Chicago residents. 

In this sense, Mayor Johnson’s current policy approach risks embracing a disproportionate focus, one that has perhaps underestimated the importance of law enforcement in both traditional deterrence and in its capacity to assist community-oriented reform. The issue of community safety is a layered problem, requiring a model that prioritizes reshaping community standards in the long-term and immediate prevention. Accountability and trust in policing are essential, but police presence is also instrumental in ensuring that residents feel protected. Effective enforcement doesn’t require severity; it depends upon the perceived reliability of crime response. As the probability of retribution decreases, social programs struggle to directly combat the immediate, oftentimes reactive and emotion-based incentives for violent action. This is why responsible policing can be a constructive tool, emphasizing the direct repercussions of criminality and fostering a sense of security to combat the interpersonal unease that can sustain cycles of violence. 

If the city’s leadership hopes to sustain its recent gains, it must reinforce its community focus with a proactive deterrence policy that works to strengthen existing systems in addition to innovating new ones. The redistribution of focus that I suggest does not necessitate a pendulum swing return to the overt surveillance strategies that prompted discriminatory policing and eroded neighborhood trust in the past. The point I am emphasizing here is that a balanced approach to public safety is not only possible but necessary. It is possible to prioritize police protection responsibly by dedicating attention to combatting current shortages, which would directly support initiatives that have coupled police enforcement with community collaboration. In contemporary politics, this coalescence of varying accounts is often lost in the pursuit of appealing to certain partisan-based virtues, at times placing ideological adherence at the forefront of political decision-making rather than public desires and interests. Policymakers must be able to hold contrasting perspectives in appropriate consideration, so that initiatives aren’t solely principally motivated, but are direct reflections of constituent needs. Residents in high-crime neighborhoods are not merely data points or statistical measures of long-term trends; they are people whose emotional well-being and perceived safety are equally important in securing sustained progress. 

Bibliography:

—Arm, J. (2023). Winds of Change in the Windy City: Crime and Public Safety Push Vallas Ahead in Chicago Mayoral Race, New Poll Shows. Shoen Cooperman Research & The Manhattan Institute. https://manhattan.institute/article/winds-of-change-in-the-windy-city-crime-and-public-safety-push-vallas-ahead-in-chicago-mayoral-race-new-poll-shows.  

—Brandon Johnson for Mayor of Chicago. 2022. “On the Issues: Public Safety and Police Reform.” https://www.brandonforchicago.com/

—Cammack, Nicole L., Lambert, Sharon F., and Ialongo, Nicolas S. 2011. “Discrepancies Between Community Violence Exposure And Perceived Neighborhood Violence.” Journal of Community Psychology 39 (1): 106-120. doi:10.1002/jcop.20421.

—Center for Neighborhood Engaged Research & Science - CORNERS. 2025. “Evaluating Illinois’ Peacekeepers Program Peacekeepers Program Data and Violence Trends Analysis.” Northwestern University. https://cdn.prod.website-files.com/634dd45091db1de63b7112d9/67ffdcbe728fe830be5886c0_Peacekeeper%20Eval%20Report_FINAL.pdf

—Speilman, Fran. 2025. “CPD to slow hiring, pause academy training next summer to cut costs, superintendent says.” Chicago Sun-Times, November 5. https://chicago.suntimes.com/city-hall/2025/11/05/chicago-police-hiring-slowdown-larry-snelling-brandon-johnson-budget

—Mayor’s Press Office. 2025. “FACT SHEET: City of Chicago Continues to Record Historic Declines in Violent Crime Under Mayor Brandon Johnson.” City of Chicago: Office of the Mayor, August 25. https://www.chicago.gov/city/en/depts/mayor/press_room/press_releases/2025/august/Fact-Sheet-2025-Crime-Decline.html

—McDonald, Catherine C., and Richmond, Therese R. 2008. “The relationship between community violence exposure and mental health symptoms in urban adolescents.” Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing 15 (10): 833-49. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2850.2008.01321.x

—Office of Governor J.B. Pritzker. 2025. “Fact Sheet: Public Safety And Violence Prevention In Illinois.” State of Illinois Newsroom, August 25. https://gov-pritzker-newsroom.prezly.com/fact-sheet-public-safety-and-violence-prevention-in-illinois

—Ross, M.C., Ochoa, E.M., & Papachristos, A.V. 2023. Evaluating the impact of a street outreach intervention on participant involvement in gun violence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 120 (46), e2300327120, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2300327120

—Wirepoints/RealClear Opinion Research Poll — October 2020 https://wirepoints.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/Wirepoints-Poll-Chicagoans-opinions-about-policing-race-and-Mayor-Lightfoots-performance.3.pdf

—NORC Spring 2025 Survey -https://www.chipublicsafety.org/crime/public-sentiment.html

Next
Next

Are You Not Entertained?: How the Memeification of Politics Has Normalized Political Violence